The implications of a handshake

The handshake analogy compares:

  1. The number of people at a gathering to the number of handshakes required to greet them all; with
  2. The number of systems in an environment to the number of interfaces required to inter-link them (and associated complexity)).

1 person (system) = 0 handshakes (ie nobody else to shake hands with => 0 interfaces).
2 people (systems) = 1 handshake (1 interface)
3 people = 3 handshakes
4 people = 6 handshakes
5 people = 10 handshakes
You can see the rapid escalation of complexity here can’t you?

There’s one massive discrepancy between the two models though. A handshake generally takes only seconds. An OSS handshake can take months just getting security sign-off (within particularly risk-averse organisations) let alone coding and working through the ripple effect of modifications to down-stream systems/interfaces.

Web tech has helped, particularly through standardisation of messaging (think HTTP, XML, JSON, REST) but microservices still need coding. Message buses and catalog-driven orchestration have also helped.

But the real moral of the story is to do whatever you can to keep the number of attendees at your “systems party” as small as possible. That might even include hiring a bouncer to kick out the undesirables who are already inside 🙂  (see ruthless simplification and the chess-board analogy)

If this article was helpful, subscribe to the Passionate About OSS Blog to get each new post sent directly to your inbox. 100% free of charge and free of spam.

Our Solutions

Share:

Most Recent Articles

No telco wants to buy an OSS/BSS

When you’re a senior exec in a telco and you’ve been made responsible for allocating resources, it’s unlikely that you ever think, “gee, we really

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.