Am I being an OSShole?
““Am I being an asshole?” In other words, am I pointing out problems or am I finding solutions?” Ramit Sethi. One of the things I’ve noticed working on large and small OSS teams is that people who excel at finding solutions thrive in both. The ones who thrive on only identifying problems seemingly only function […]
Treating your OSS/BSS suite like a share portfolio
Like most readers, I’m sure your OSS/BSS suite consists of many components. What if you were to look at each of those components as assets? In a share portfolio, you analyse your stocks to see which assets are truly worth keeping and which should be divested. We don’t tend to take such a long-term analytical […]
2019 predictions for OSS
Well, this is the time of year when people make big predictions for the coming year. But let me start by saying the headline is something of a misnomer. I’m not clever enough to have any predictions for 2019 for a couple of reasons: There are far too many clever people working across the myriad […]
How to build a personal, cloud-native OSS sandpit
As a project for 2019, we’re considering the development of a how-to training course that provides a step-by-step guide to build your own OSS sandpit to play with. It will be built around cloud-native and open-source components. It will be cutting-edge and micro-scaled (but highly scalable in case you want to grow it). Does this […]
How to kill the OSS RFP (part 4)
This is the fourth, and final part (I think) in the series on killing the OSS RFI/RFP process, a process that suppliers and customers alike find to be inefficient. The concept is based on an initiative currently being investigated by TM Forum. The previous three posts focused on the importance of trusted partnerships and the […]
How to kill the OSS RFP (part 3)
As the title suggests, this is the third in a series of articles spawned by TM Forum’s initiative to investigate better procurement practices than using RFI / RFP processes. There’s no doubt the RFI / RFP / contract model can be costly and time-consuming. To be honest, I feel the RFI / RFP process can […]
How to kill the OSS RFP (part 2)
Yesterday’s post discussed an initiative that TM Forum is currently investigating – trying to identify an alternate OSS procurement process to the traditional RFI/RFP/contract approach. It spoke about trusting partnerships being the (possibly) mythological key to killing off the RFP. Have you noticed how much fear there is going into any OSS procurement event? Fear […]
How to kill the OSS RFP
TM Forum is currently investigating ways to procure OSS without resorting to the current RFI / RFP approach. It has published the following survey results. . As it shows, the RFI / RFP isn’t fit for purpose for suppliers and customers alike. It’s not just the RFI/RFP process. We could extend this further and include […]
OSS answers that are simple but wrong vs complex but right
“We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills…” John F Kennedy. Let’s face it. The business of running a telco is complex. […]
That’s not where to disrupt your OSS
The diagram below comes from an actual client’s functionality usage profile. The x-axis shows the functionality / use-cases. The y-axis shows the number of uses (it could equally represent usefulness or value). Each big-impact demand (ie individual bars on the left-side of the graph) warrants separate investigation. The bars on the right side (ie the […]
OSS’ Rosetta Stone
When working on OSS projects, I find that linking or reference keys are so valuable at so many levels. Not just data management within the OSS database, but project management, design activities, task assignment / delivery, etc. People might call things all sorts of different names, which leads to confusion. It seems like every single […]
Cannibalisation intrigues me
We’ve all heard the Kodak story. They invented digital cameras but stuck them in a drawer because it was going to cannibalise their dominant position in the photographic film revenue stream… eventually leading to bankruptcy. Swisscom invented an equivalent of WhatsApp years before WhatsApp came onto the market. It allowed users (only Swisscom users, not […]
Is your data getting too heavy for your OSS to lift?
“Data mass is beginning to exhibit gravitational properties – it’s getting heavy – and eventually it will be too big to move.” Guy Lupo in this article on TM Forum’s Inform that also includes contributions from George Glass and Dawn Bushaus. Really interesting concept, and article, linked above. The touchpoint explosion is helping to make […]
Presence vs omni-presence and the green button of OSS design
In OSS there are some tasks that require availability (the green button on communicator). The Network Operations Centre (NOC) is one. But does it require on-site presence in the NOC? An earlier post showed how wrong I was about collaboration rooms. It seems that ticket flicking (and perhaps communication tools like slack) is the preferred […]
Intent to simplify our OSS
The left-hand panel of the triptych below shows the current state of interactions with most OSS. There are hundreds of variants inbound via external sources (ie multi-channel) and even internal sources (eg different service types). Similarly, there are dozens of networks (and downstream systems), each with different interface models. Each needs different formatting and integration […]
Telco services that are bigger, faster, better and the OSS that supports that
We all know of the tectonic shifts in the world of telco services, profitability and business models. One common trend is for telcos to offer pipes that are bigger and faster. Seems like a commoditising business model to me, but our OSS still need to support that. How? Through enabling efficiency at scale. Building tools, […]
Facebook’s algorithmic feed for OSS
“This is the logic that led Facebook inexorably to the ‘algorithmic feed’, which is really just tech jargon for saying that instead of this random (i.e. ‘time-based’) sample of what’s been posted, the platform tries to work out which people you would most like to see things from, and what kinds of things you would […]
Are we better off waiting for OSS technology to catch up?
Yesterday’s post discussed Dave Duggal’s concept of 20th century OSS being all about centralizing command and control to gain efficiency through vertical integration and mass standardization, whilst 21st century OSS are about decentralization – gaining efficiency through horizontal integration of partner ecosystems and mass customization. We talked about transitioning from a telco market driven by […]
OSS feature parity. A functionality arms race
OSS Vendor 1. “I have 1 million features.” (Dr Evil puts finger in mouth) OSS Vendor 2. “Yeah, well I have 1,000,001 features in my OSS.” This is the arms-race that we see in OSS, just like almost any other tech product. I imagine that vendors get into this arms-race because they wish to differentiate. […]
Pitching an OSS? Don’t call it OSS.
““If you asked me how to sell cybersecurity, I wouldn’t call it cybersecurity.” The raw truth of the statement hit me like a lightning bolt between the eyes. Cybersecurity might loosely describe what we do, and we tell people it’s what we’re selling, but it’s not what people buy. Safety. Assurance. Peace of mind. Confidence. […]