Just wondering – do you think there would be any correlation between the number of fall-outs through an OSS/BSS stack and the level of security on a network?
In theory, they are quite separate. NetOps and SecOps are usually completely separate units, use different thinking models, don’t rely on common tools (apart from the network itself), etc.
The reason I ask the question is because fall-out rates amplify with complexity. And within the chaos of complexity, are there more places for the bad guys to hide?
Thoughts?
Earlier this week, I was lucky enough to be introduced to a talented RAN automation expert. He’s one of Australia’s foremost, hands-on, experts on SON
I was listening to a group of telco experts on a podcast the other day. As they were talking, I kept picturing the image of
Earlier in the year, we wrote a series of articles about the chasm that exists between OSS/BSS buyers and sellers (pt1, pt2, pt3, pt4, pt5, pt6). “The chasm” is
Actually, maybe a few related questions. As you’ve seen from recent articles such as this, I’m increasingly interested in the cross-over worlds of comms and
Here at Passionate About OSS, we are exactly that – Passionate About OSS (Operational Support Systems). We’re also passionate about BSS, NMS, or any other names you call the tools that help to operationalise your network.
